Minimum Wage: Exploitation through a Subsistent Wage

Minimum operate developing through a Subsistent WageThe Raising of the Minimum Wage victimisation through a Subsistent WageI. IntroductionFor many years in the United States the minimum lock has not aligned with the cost of living. minor wage workers typically earn the minimum wage and brush offnot sustain themselves receiv able to the constant rise of housing, food, and health c be. The middle class manipulates the proletariat through using with a subsistent wage that rarely increases. In this essay, I aim to license that the elite cause a class affair to keep the bourgeoisie in power to maintain a hegemony over the dispirit class.II. The elect(ip) PerspectiveIn a New York Times article titled, higher(prenominal)(prenominal) Minimum Wage May Have Losers, Noam Scheiber highlights that many cities and states are considering facts of life the minimum wage, however some economists and business owners warn that a lift may be problematic for business owners and current g rim wage workers. At the annual Ameri fundament Economic Association, Economics professor legerdemain Horton Of New York University de proceedred an essay concerning an sample he did regarding raising the minimum wage. utilise an online platform, employees post jobs anonymously. Workers then submit an hourly wage competing for them. Scheiber statesMr. Horton, working with the platform, was able to impose a minimum wage random on unmatchable-quarter of just about 160,000 jobs posted over roughly a month and a half(a) in 2013. If a worker proposed an hourly wage that was below the minimum, the platforms package asked him or her to raise the bid until it cleared the threshold. (cite)At prima facie, the experiment demonstrated that when the minimum wage increased there was little if no decline in hiring. However, the hours a worker spent on a job fell for the jobs that were lower wage before the study. In addition, Horton claimed that employers were hiring to a greater extent pro ductive works to compensate for the lost earnings from the adjusted higher wage. Consequently, the lower wage workers were less productive, according to Horton, and thus lost their jobs. He concluded that raising the minimum wage could cost low-skilled workers their jobs, as employers switch them with higher productive individuals. Additionally, some economists claim that the to a greater extent productive workers that do not take the jobs from the low skilled workers give also essential a pay raise, which may cause more economic issues. Furthermore, others such(prenominal) as Zane Tankel, chief executive of Applebees restaurant infers that higher wages will accelerate automation, which will offset costs and leave may workers jobless.1III. A Sociological CritiqueHortons data is tailored to benefit the bourgeoisie and highlights how the individuals in elite position help maintain a hegemony over the lower class. Consequently, the proletariat is prone a subsistent wage and is vic timised for their labor. Marx claimed that the worker is given just enough pay to survive and have a family and children so that when the worker falters, the children can take over the subsistent wage.2 Hortons experiment highlights how the worker is exploited with a subsistent wage. In addition, his data demonstrates that low wage workers will discharge their jobs to the high output workers. This conflict amongst the two workers causes what Marx termed alienation. Marx defined it asthe breakdown of, the separation, from, the natural interconnection between people and their productive activities, the products they produce, the confrere workers with whom they produce those things, and with what they are authorityly capable of becoming.3This alienation keeps individuals from achieving their full potential and keeps them in a subservient state.Scheibers article contains a comment from Applebees executive who states that forced higher wages will accelerate automation, thus more empl oyees will lose their jobs. The inference that workers will be replaced faster by automation demonstrates that the bourgeoisie does not value the labor that the proletariat loses for a meager wage. Marxist theory states that all value comes from the labor and is then traceable, in capitalism, to the proletariat.4 The bourgeoisie does not recognize this value and further exploitation of the surplus value that is extracted from the worker. Scheibers article demonstrates that Horton neglects the conflict between classes and actually helps the elite in a bias fashion.IV. SolutionOne may analyse if the worker and capitalist comprehend the magnitude of the conflict between them. Marx would anticipate that, both the proletariat and the capitalists bourgeoisie have an inaccurate sense of themselves, their relationship to one another, and the way in which capitalism operates.5 While this may be unbowed that the average individual or business owner is unaware of this conflict and holds fa lse consciousness, it is unlikely that Professor Horton is ignorant of these conflicts. While some are aware and have false consciousness, it is crucial that the majority of both capitalists and workers puzzle aware or have class consciousness-the ability of a class, in particular the proletariat, to overcome false consciousness and attain an accurate sense of the capitalist system.6 Additionally, once this consciousness is achieved, then the workers must engage in what Marx termed praxis, or the idea that people, especially the proletariat, must take concrete serve in order to overcome capitalism. This solution of praxis is extreme and workers can most likely keep some form of capitalism but demand a proper wage. The consciousness compounded with praxis can even out the conflict between the classes and articles concerning the debate over low wages would be nonexistent.V. ConclusionThe article Higher Minimum Wage May Have Losers, highlights the conflict that individuals such as H orton create between the workers and capitalists. The conflict between the two creates what Marx claimed to be a loss of clement potential through exploitation, alienation of surplus value, and the fact that workers work and live under a subsistent wage. The solution is class consciousness and praxis that results in change.Bibliography1 Cite article2 Pg 263 Pg 244 265 276 28